BOTANICA FARMACEUTICA DELLE PIANTE OFFICINALI - FARMACOGNOSIA M - Z

Module BOTANICA FARMACEUTICA DELLE PIANTE OFFICINALI

Taxonomic system and evolution of systems. Plant tissues: Meristematic or embryonic tissues. Adult or definitive tissues: parenchymal system, tegumental system, conducting system, segregating system, and mechanical system.
Reproduction of plant organisms: vegetative and sexual. Biological cycles.
Fungi. General characters. Morphology. Reproduction. Pharmaceutical and applicative interest of: Zygomycota, Ascomycota, Basidiomycota. Fungal intoxication.
Algae. General characters. Morphology. Reproduction. Pharmaceutical and applicative interest of: Rhodophyta: Gelidiaceae: Gelidium sp.; Phaeophyta: Laminariaceae: Laminaria sp., Fucus
Spermatophytes. Gymnosperms. Morphology and pharmaceutical and application interest of: Ginkgophyta, Ephedrales

Spermatophytes. Gymnosperms. Morphology and pharmaceutical and application interest of: Cycadophyta, Ginkgophyta, Coniferophyta, Ephedrales
Angiosperms. The flower and its elements. The inflorescences. Sexual reproduction. The seed. The fruit. The leaves.

LILIOPSIDA (MONOCOTILEDONES)

ALLIACEAE: Allium sativum;

LILIACEAE: Colchicum autumnale

ZINGIBERACEAE: Curcuma longa, Zingiber officinalis

MAGNOLIOPSIDA (DICOTILEDONES)

ALOEACEAE: Aloe vera, Aloe barbadensis, Aloe ferox

APIACEAE: Angelica archangelica, Foeniculum vulgare, Pimpinella anisum

APOCYNACEAE: Strophanthus sp., Vinca

ASTERACEAE: Arnica montana, Matricaria chamomilla, Anthemis nobilis, Calendula officinalis, Cynara scolymus, Echinacea sp., Silybum marianum, Taraxacum officinale.

BURSERACEAE: Boswellia

CACTACEAE: Opuntia ficus indica

CANNABACEAE: Cannabis sativa, Cannabis indica, Humulus lupulus

ERICACEAE: Arctostaphylos uva-ursi; Vaccinum sp

ERYTHROXYLACEAE: Erythroxylon coca

EUPHORBIACEAE: Ricinus communis

FABACEAE: Cassia senna

GROSSULARIACEAE: Ribes nigrum

LAMIACEAE: Mentha sp., Lavandula officinalis, Thymus vulgaris, Salvia officinalis, Melissa officinalis

LAURACEAE: Cinnamomum sp., Laurus nobilis

MALVACEAE: Altea officinalis, Malva sylvestris

MYRTACEAE: Melaleuca alternifolia

OLEACEAE: Olea europea, Fraxinus sp

PAPAVERACEAE: Papaver sp.

PASSIFLORACEAE: Passiflora incarnata

PEDALIACEAE: Harpagophytum procumbens

RHAMNACEAE: Rhamnus frangula, Rhamnus purshiana

RUTACEAE: Citrus sp.

SCROPHULARIACEAE: Digitalis purpurea, Digitalis lanata

SOLANACEAE: Atropa belladonna, Datura stramonium, Nicotina tabacum

STERCULIACEAE: Cola acuminata, C. vera, Teobroma cacao

TAXACEAE: Taxus brevifolia

VALERIANACEAE: Valeriana officinalis

VITACEAE: Vitis vinifera

1. Maugini E., Maleci Bini L., Mariotti Lippi M. - Manuale di Botanica Farmaceutica IX Ed. – PICCIN 2014

2. Leporatti M., Foddai S., Tommasini L. - Testo atlante di anatomia vegetale e delle piante officinali – PICCIN 1997

3. Poli F. - Biologia Farmaceutica - II Ed. - Pearson 2019

EVALUATIVE CRITERIA.
The final exam will be evaluated based on the following indicators weighted equally and consistent with what is described in the expected learning outcomes (Dublin Descriptors):
- personal processing skills and operational initiative;
- ability to consult and use bibliographic materials;
- expository skills;
- scientific understanding of the topic.
Therefore, the final grade takes into account various factors listed below.
Quality of knowledge, skills, competencies possessed and/or manifested:
(a) appropriateness, correctness and congruence of knowledge
(b) appropriateness, correctness and congruence of skills
(c) appropriateness, correctness and congruence of skills
Expository mode:
(a) Expressive ability;
(b) Appropriate use of discipline-specific language;
(c) Logical skills and consequentiality in linking content;
(d) Ability to connect different topics by finding common points and establishing a coherent overall pattern, i.e., taking care of structure, organization and logical connections of expository discourse;
(e) Ability to synthesize including through the use of the subject's own symbolism and the graphic expression of notions and concepts, in the form of, for example, formulas, diagrams, equations.
Relational qualities:
Willingness to exchange and interact with the lecturer during the interview.
Personal qualities:
(a) critical spirit;
(b) ability to self-evaluate;
(c) problem-solving skills;
(d) ability to make decisions.
 
Based on the above, the rating can be:
(a) Sufficient (18 to 20/30)
Candidate demonstrates little acquired knowledge, superficial level, many gaps. Modest expressive skills, but still sufficient to sustain a coherent dialogue; logical skills and consequentiality in connecting topics of elementary level; poor synthesis skills and rather stunted graphic expression skills; poor interaction with the lecturer during the interview.
(b) Fair (21 to 23)
Candidate demonstrates fair acquisition of notions, but little in-depth study, few gaps; more than sufficient expressive skills to sustain a coherent dialogue; acceptable command of scientific language; logical skills and consequentiality in connecting topics of moderate complexity; more than sufficient ability to synthesize and acceptable graphic expression skills.
Example Questions: 1.Describe the morphology and classification of the plant body 2. Describe the morphology of meristematic tissues 4. Characteristics and function of primary and secondary metabolites 5. Biotechnology of medicinal plants. 6. Medicinal plants for the production of hormones, vaccines, and natural and bioactive products.
(c) Good (24 to 26)
The candidate demonstrates a fairly broad background, moderate depth of knowledge, with small gaps; satisfactory expressive skills and significant mastery of scientific language; well-detectable dialogical skills and critical spirit; good synthesis skills and more than acceptable graphical expression skills.
(d) Excellent (27 to 29)
The candidate demonstrates a very extensive, well-developed body of knowledge, with marginal gaps; remarkable expressive skills and high mastery of scientific language; remarkable dialogical ability, good competence and relevant aptitude for logical synthesis; high synthesis and graphic expression skills.
(e) Excellent (30)
The candidate demonstrates a very extensive and in-depth knowledge base, any gaps irrelevant; high expressive ability and high mastery of scientific language; remarkable dialogical ability, marked aptitude for making connections between different topics; excellent synthesis ability and great familiarity with graphic expression.

Learning assessment may also be carried out on line, should the conditions require it. Information for students with disabilities and / or SLD: To guarantee equal opportunities and in compliance with the laws in force, interested students can ask for a personal interview in order to plan any compensatory and / or dispensatory measures, based on the teaching objectives and specifications needs. It is also possible to contact the CInAP contact person (Center for Active and Participatory Integration - Services for Disabilities and / or SLD) of the Department, prof.ssa Santina Chiechio. 

Exam Dates
Exam dates are posted on the Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences website: http://www.dsf.unict.it/sites/default/files/files/ESAMI%20CDLM%20FARMACIA(21).pdf